Legal Opinion

Holland v. Forcum-James Cooperage & Lumber Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

This action was commenced before a justice of the peace to recover damages from the company “for breach of contract let to defendant for building a dwelling house . . . in failing .' . . to use good material for the roof, and failing to put the roof on in workmanlike manner ... as promised, causing the roof to leak and let in rain, to the damage of the house and furniture. ’ ’

The justice of the peace awarded judgment for $400, and the company appealed. In the circuit court the company pleaded nil debit, non assumpsit, res adjudicata, and the statute of limitations of three years. Upon issues…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fort v. OrndoffTennessee Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Scatchard v. BargeTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  3. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. Branner'sTennessee Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Phœnix Iron Works Co. v. RheaTennessee Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Samuel Insull v. New York, World-Telegram Corporation, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  2. Brummitt Tire Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  3. Bowles v. ChapmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Wood v. Cannon CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
  5. Abbott Widdicombe v. McGuireTennessee Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API