Legal Opinion

Fort v. Orndoff

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1872PublishedCited by 9 opinions

PROM ROBERTSON. From the Chancery Court, March Term, 1871. Chas. G. Smith, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, C. J.

Eli Orndoff, as guardian of the minor heirs of John W. Orndoff, brought two suits in the Circuit *168Court of Robertson, county against Sugg Fort & Co. One was to recover of them, the amount of four notes, each for $200, payable to Eli Orndoff, guardian, for rent of a saw-mill, all of which were due, and unpaid ; the other was to recover damages for breach of a contract of lease for one-half of the water privilege of Red River at and near the saw-mill of Orndoff’s heirs upon said river, at the rate of $200 annually, from August 30, 1862, to 30th of August, 1866.

Before any trial or judgment, Sugg…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holland v. Forcum-James Cooperage & Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Red River Furnace Co. v. Tennessee Central RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Tennessee Hoop Co. v. TempletonTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Buquo v. Title Guaranty & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  5. Ward v. Paducah & Memphis R. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API