Legal Opinion

Samuel Insull v. New York, World-Telegram Corporation, a New York Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 30, 1959No. 12681PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge,

Samuel Insull, herein called plaintiff, a citizen and resident of Illinois, brought an action for libel in an Illinois state court against the corporate owners and publishers of publications described as Scripps-Howard daily newspapers, and the individual editors thereof. 1 No defendant is a citizen or resident of lili-nois. Charles T. Lucey, the author of the libelous article appearing in the Scripps-Howard newspapers published by the corporate defendants, is a defendant.

Summons was served outside the state of Illinois on each defendant, together with a copy of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Nelson v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Reed v. Real Detective Publishing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. William F. Buckley, Jr. v. New York Post CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Kramer v. VoglNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Post v. American Cleaning Equipment CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API