Legal Opinion
Sherman v. Sherman
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 23, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this decision, we affirm the trial court and hold that plaintiffs’ action is barred by the 4-year statute of limitations governing the sale of goods.
*394FACTS
[¶ 2.] In 1980, Geralyn Sherman and her then-husband Gary Sherman purchased a feed store in Salem, South Dakota (Salem store) on a contract for deed from a third party. A warranty deed conveying the property to them was filed in 1990.
[¶ 3.] Contemporaneous with Gary and Geralyn operating the Salem store, Gary’s parents, John and Joann Sherman, owned and operated a feed store in Howard, South Dakota (Howard…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kurylas, Inc. v. BradskySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Peterson v. HohmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Farmers Elevator Co. of Elk Point v. LyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Andrew Stumler v. Ferry-Morse Seed Company, Thomas S. Castle Farms, Inc., and A. L. Castle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Azevedo v. MinisterNevada Supreme Court · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Owens v. FEM Electric Association, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Owens v. FEM Electric Association, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Sherman v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000