Legal Opinion

Oppenheimer v. Oppenheimer

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 23, 1974No. 2 CA-CIV 1600PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Three questions are raised on this appeal regarding the dissolution of the marriage of Ernest and Shirley Oppenheimer. As posed by Ernest, they are:

“[1] IS THE AWARD OF SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE IN THE SUM! OF $400 PER MONTH FOR 15 YEARS PLUS $75 PER MONTH FOR TWO YEARS EXCESSIVE AFTER A MARRIAGE OF 28 [SIC] MONTHS?

WAS EVIDENCE OF THE HUSBAND’S RELATIONSHIP WITH ANOTHER WOMAN AFTER SEPARATION WRONGFULLY ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE OVER HUSBAND’S OBJECTION?

DID THE TRIAL COURT HAVE JURISDICTION TO GIVE THE WIFE THE RIGHT TO LIVE IN THE FAMILY HOME WHICH WAS HELD IN JOINT TENANCY, FOR…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re Marriage of RosanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Collier v. CollierArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Becchelli v. BecchelliArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Burkhardt v. BurkhardtArizona Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Molnar v. MolnarWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Lindsay v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Boyd v. BoydSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. Baum v. BaumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. In Re the Marriage of FurimskyArizona Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API