Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Furimsky

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1979No. 13791-PRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice.

The appellant appealed the order of the superior court which modified the decree of dissolution by awarding the appellee one-half of 17/a)ths of appellant’s military retirement pay. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the superior court. Furimsky v. Furimsky, 122 Ariz. 385, 595 P.2d 177 (App.1978). Appellant sought review by this court.

Because of the conflict between the decision of the Court of Appeals, Division Two, in Czarnecki v. Czarnecki, - Ariz. -, - P.2d — (App.1978) (2 CA-CIV 2499 filed Jan. 24, 1978) and the decision of Division One of the Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Neal v. NealArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. DeMarce v. DeMarceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Headley v. HeadleyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Oppenheimer v. OppenheimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bender v. BenderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  2. Steczo v. SteczoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Reed v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. Sample v. SampleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Sandoval v. SandovalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API