Legal Opinion
Black Construction Corp. v. Agsalud
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1982No. 7345PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
NAKAMURA, J.
The question is whether a building contractor organized as a corporation under the laws of Nevada and engaged in construction activity on Guam is subject to the Hawaii Employment Security Law by virtue of HRS § 383-2(c). Black Construction Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of a Hawaii corporation, E.E. Black, Ltd., challenges a coverage determination made by the Unemployment Insurance Division of the Hawaii State Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (hereafter the Division), raising constitutional as well as statutory objections. But we agree…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hooven & Allison Co. v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1357 v. Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1986
- Treloar v. Swinerton and Walberg Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. LoHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
- Kaiama v. AguilarHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. UiHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.