Millbrook Farm v. Watson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
As of the first Monday of March 1966, approximately 535 acres of plaintiff’s land, situated in an unsubdivided rural area and mostly unimproved, were assessed by defendant for tax purposes in two parcels. Upon refusal of defendant to assess plaintiff’s property in nine parcels, as requested and as it claims has been done by defendant and his predecessors for more than 40 years, plaintiff brought this action in mandamus to compel an assessment of such property in nine different parcels, separately assessed. From a judgment denying relief plaintiff appeals.
The record has reached this court by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Barker Bros., Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Smith v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Utah Construction Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sevde v. Board of Review of City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Metropolitan Stevedore Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2009