Legal Opinion
City of Milford v. Coppola Const. Co., Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 14, 2006No. AC 26106PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiff, the city of Milford, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying its application to modify and correct the arbitration award and confirming the award of $136,787.50 in favor of the defendant, Coppola Construction Company, Inc. The plaintiff claims that the court should have modified the arbitrator’s award pursuant to General Statutes § 52-419 (a) 1 because the award (1) failed to conform to the submission and (2) contained material miscalculations. The defendant claims that the submission to arbitration was unrestricted because the plaintiff rescinded…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bic Pen Corporation v. Local No. 134Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Harty v. Cantor Fitzgerald and Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. White Oak Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Cruz v. Visual Perceptions, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Levinson v. Westport National BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Between Rounds Franchise Corp. v. EDGR Real Estate, LLCConnecticut Superior Court · 2011
- Drill Masters-Eldorado Tool, Inc. v. PCC Specialty Products, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.