Legal Opinion

Schneider & Davis v. Ferguson & Son

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1890No. 6474PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. Geo. N. Aldredge.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Associate Justice.

—This suit was brought by appellees to recover of appellants damages for the wrongful and malicious suing out of an attachment, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs for $300 actual and $200 exemplary damages.

The plaintiffs were merchants in the city of Dallas, doing a small grocery business, and were indebted to several creditors, among whom were the defendants. On the 18th of May, 1881, Morris & Randall sued out an attachment against the plaintiffs and levied it upon a part of their stock in trade. On the next day Schneider & Davis sued out…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Holmes v. BucknerTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Stewart v. StewartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Rowell v. KleinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Flaniken v. NealTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Hallowell v. PageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Galveston & Western Railway Co. v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Brand v. Colorado Salt Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  3. Neyland v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Texas Pacific Coal Company v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API