Legal Opinion

Moredock v. McMurry

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*463OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

The sole issue with which we deal is the proper practice under Rule 51.01, Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure.

We have considered the opinion of the Court of Appeals in the light of the petition for the writ of certiorari and the most excellent briefs submitted by all counsel and, except to the extent of its treatment of Rule 51.01,1 Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, we are in full accord with the findings and conclusions of that court.

We deny the petition with a published opinion because we consider it in the best interests of the bench and bar that the new Rules of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. C. E. Bradshaw, Sr. v. Vic ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  2. Ruth Hetzel v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  3. James A. Hardigg and Oscar C. Hardigg v. Cecil M. Inglett, as Administrator of the Estate of Thomas W. Rivenbark, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  4. Arrie Garland v. Material Service Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Underwood v. Waterslides of Mid-America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  2. Country Insurance v. Agricultural Development, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Country Insurance v. Agricultural Development, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Larry Burchfield v. Timothy J. Renfree, M.D.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API