Legal Opinion

United States v. Kim

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 14, 1992No. ACMR 9100564PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ARKOW, Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial and, contrary to his plea, was found guilty of desertion in violation of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 *554U.S.C. § 885 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for two years, total forfeitures, and reduction to Private El.

Appellant contends in this appeal that the evidence is insufficient as a matter of fact and law to support his conviction for desertion. We disagree.

Appellant was charged as follows: In that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. HoltU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. GonzalezU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  2. United States v. Huet-VaughnU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API