Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 26, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RUDMAN, Justice.

The cities of Portland and South Portland (the cities) appeal from the Public Utilities Commission (the Commission) decision rejecting the Portland Water District’s plan to impose a 37% rate differential between the cities and the towns it serves (Cape Elizabeth, Cumberland, Falmouth, Gorham, Scarborough, Standish and Windham) as unjust and unreasonable, and reducing the rate differential to no more than 15%. Because the cities have failed to establish that the Commission has committed legal error and because the rate differential set by the Commission is reasonable, we affirm…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. Mars Hill & Blaine Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Office of the Public Advocate v. Public Utilities Commission et al.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API