Bevins v. Richard

{¶ 1} We affirm the Twelfth District Court of Appeals’ dismissal of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by appellant, Andrew Bevins Jr., because the petition is a successive petition in habeas corpus and because he had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. We also deny the motions for default judgment and summary judgment filed by Bevins in this court, because the Civil Rules do not ordinarily apply on appeal.

Facts

{¶ 2} Bevins was incarcerated following his convictions for aggravated burglary and rape. He was sentenced to a total aggregate sentence of 20 years for…