Legal Opinion

In re Morell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 19, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

I

Respondent Philip M. Morell was admitted to practice law in New Jersey in 1988, and in New York in 1989. Respondent has twice before been the subject of ethical discipline. In May 1999, as part of an agreement in lieu of discipline, respondent admitted a violation of New Jersey Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation) and RPC 3.4 (fairness to opposing party and counsel) for failure to diligently prosecute a claim and to comply with his adversary’s discovery request. Respondent attended and completed a diversion program in November 1999.

On November 20, 2001, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. In Re InfinitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Matter of EdsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. In Re KantorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  5. Matter of KornreichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re KivlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  2. In Re Opinion No. 735 of the Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional EthicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API