In Re Kantor
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin
The respondent, Philip L. Kantor, is an attorney with a past disciplinary record who abandoned his clients without so much as a warning, leaving their matters in jeopardy; who declined to answer the allegations in the resulting ethics complaint, which charged him with, among other things, gross neglect; who offered no explanation for his conduct or evidence in mitigation of discipline to the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB); and who defied this Court’s order to appear and give cause why he should not be disbarred for his professional derelictions. We cannot conclude, as does the DRB, that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re GalloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- In re ClarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- In re GoldenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- In re HolmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- In re KantorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re KivlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- In re MorellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- In re PoveromoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- In re DevinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- In re GalloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.