Legal Opinion

Gutz v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 9, 2005No. 31928-4-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Stanley Johnson and the marital community appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to vacate a default order and judgment in favor of Desiree and Sharon Gutz for injuries allegedly caused by an automobile collision. The Johnsons argue that: (1) their insurance company’s extensive communications with Sharon Gutz and the Gutzes’ counsel constituted an informal appearance under CR 55(a)(3) that entitled them to notice of the default order; and (2) the trial court erred in denying their motion to vacate the default judgment because they satisfied the four elements of relief under CR…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. White v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Showalter v. OatsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Johnson v. Cash StoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morin v. BurrisWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Morin v. BurrisWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Ha v. Signal Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Rosander v. Nightrunners Transport, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Rosander v. Nightrunners Transport, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API