Legal Opinion
Rosander v. Nightrunners Transport, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 12, 2008No. 36847-1-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
¶1 Nightrunners Transport Ltd. appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion to vacate a default order and judgment. It argues that (1) the judgment violated CR 55 and the due process clause because Nightrunners appeared but did not receive notice of the default hearing until after it was held and (2) the trial court abused its discretion when it held that Nightrunners did not present a prima facie defense or prove excusable neglect and when it affirmed a $925,794.54 damages award. We affirm.
FACTS1
¶2 Juanita Rosander drove down two-lane Highway 14 and stopped to make a left turn. Behind her,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Servatron, Inc. v. Intelligent Wireless Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Meade v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Angelina Salazar v. Era Living, Llc, Dba Ida Culver House BroadviewCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Capital One Bank USA, N.A. v. Charmon WallaceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Charity Meade v. David A. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.