Legal Opinion

Tower v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 26, 1954No. C. D. 1579PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MollisoN, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of the above-entitled protests, which were consolidated for trial and disposition, is described on the invoices as “box shooks,” and was assessed with duty at the rate of 33% per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “manufactures of wood * * * not specially provided for.”

As originally filed, each of the protests claimed the merchandise to be dutiable at the rate of 7% per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 407 of the said act, as modified by the Mexican Trade Agreement, T. D. 50797, for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  2. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  4. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Sortex Co. of North America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API