Tower v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
MollisoN, Judge:
The merchandise the subject of the above-entitled protests, which were consolidated for trial and disposition, is described on the invoices as “box shooks,” and was assessed with duty at the rate of 33% per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “manufactures of wood * * * not specially provided for.”
As originally filed, each of the protests claimed the merchandise to be dutiable at the rate of 7% per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 407 of the said act, as modified by the Mexican Trade Agreement, T. D. 50797, for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Sortex Co. of North America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968