Joblon v. Solow
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Richard and Magdalena Joblon (the “Joblons”) have moved for an order permitting reconsideration of the Court’s Opinion dated February 13, 1996, and docketed February 14, 1996, 914 F.Supp. 1044 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (the “Opinion”). In the alternative, the Joblons seek certification for interlocutory appeal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292.
For the following reasons both motions will be denied.
Background
The nature of the parties, prior proceedings, and facts underlying this action are set forth in the Opinion, familiarity with which is assumed. The Opinion, inter…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morser v. AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMSDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Caleb & Co. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Ashley Meadows Farm, Inc. v. American Horse Shows Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Fulani v. BradyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Ameritrust Co. National Ass'n v. DewDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joblon v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Joblon v. SolowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Joblon v. SolowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998