Legal Opinion

City of Pleasant Grove v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 21, 1987No. 85-1244PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

Appellant, Pleasant Grove, a city in Alabama that until recently had an all-white population, is covered by §5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 79 Stat. 439, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1973c, and accordingly must seek preclearance before instituting any change in a standard, practice, or procedure affecting voting.1 Appellant unsuccessfully sought preclearance by the Attorney General for the annexation of two parcels of land, one vacant and the other inhabited by a few whites. Appellant also failed to convince a three-judge District Court that the annexations did not have the purpose of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. City of Rome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Perkins v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. Sheffield Bd. of Comm'rsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Reno v. Bossier Parish School BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Reno v. Bossier Parish School BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Georgia v. Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Montero v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API