State v. Curtis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendant’s assignments of error numbered 1 and 2 áre directed to the action of the trial court in sustaining the solicitor’s objections to certain questions asked of the State’s witness Russell Lee Clay, Jr. on cross-examination. Defendant has cited no authority on the questions presented. We have carefully reviewed the excluded testimony and are of the opinion that no harmful error was committed therein.
By assignments of error numbered 3 and 5 defendant presents the question whether there was sufficient evidence of armed robbery to take the case to the jury. Defendant argues…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. McCaskillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974