Legal Opinion
Superpumper, Inc. v. Nerland Oil, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1998No. Civil 970307PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Superpumper, Inc., appealed from an Order compelling arbitration issued by the Stutsman County District Court. We conclude this Order is not appealable under either the Uniform Arbitration Act or the Federal Arbitration Act. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal.
I
[¶ 2] Superpumper purchased the Dakota Fuel Stop in Jamestown, North Dakota, from Nerland Oil in 1995. As part of the purchase, Superpumper executed a promissory note in favor of Nerland Oil. The note was secured by a mortgage against the Dakota Fuel Stop. The promissory note, mortgage, and purchase…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v. LuckieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Filanto, S.P.A. v. Chilewich International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wells v. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Collins v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Webb v. American Employers GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Kluck v. KluckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.