Legal Opinion

Shirley v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Co.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided October 19, 1984No. CIV-2-84-259PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HULL, District Judge.

The Court has studied the Magistrate’s report and recommendation in light of the plaintiff’s exceptions and finds that, regardless of whether or not the Tennessee Human Development Commission Act, T.C.A. § 4-21-101, et seq., permits recovery for physical and emotional injury resulting from age discrimination, it is improper to use this Court’s pendant jurisdiction to widen the scope of recovery beyond the limits of the federal statute upon which jurisdiction is predicated.

Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss the claims for physical and emotional injury is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. Henry Carl DEAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Ellis v. Logan Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1982
  4. Berry v. General Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cripps v. United Biscuit of Great BritainDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989
  2. Belcher v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1988
  3. England v. Fleetguard, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1995
  4. Pascoe v. Hoyle Lowdermilk, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1985
  5. Easton v. Louisville & Jefferson County Board of HealthDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API