Legal Opinion

Bray v. Southern Iron & Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 24, 1922No. 13139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Valdosta — Judge Cranford. December 9, 1921.

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, P. J;

1. (a) “In a contract for the sale of goods, words descriptive of the subject-matter of sale . . are ordinarily to be regarded as a warranty.” Henderson Elevator Co. v. North Ga. Milling Co., 126 Ga. 279 (55 S. E. 50).(b) Where goods are sold under an express warranty, and the contract does not expressly provide for inspection prior to acceptance, there is no duty resting upon the purchaser to exercise ordinary care by inspecting the goods tendered, in order to ascertain whether or not they come up to the representations, since he is entitled to rely upon the warranty embraced…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moultrie Repair Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Henderson Elevator Co. v. North Georgia Milling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Miller & Co. v. Moore, Sims & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  4. Cook & Co. v. FinchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Snellgrove v. DingelhoefCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mound City Roofing Tile Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Georgia Timberlands, Inc. v. Southern Airway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Smith v. Loftis Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Brown v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Camp v. Works.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API