Legal Opinion

Mound City Roofing Tile Co. v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 15, 1924No. 15350PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “In order for tlie holder of a promissory note given for the purchase-price of an article to claim that the maker has waived his right to set up as a defense that the article was defective, it must appear that at the time the note was given the maker had actual knowledge that the article was defective, or that, prior to the giving of the note, he had inspected and examined the article in question, and the defects therein were of such a character as to be patent to the person making the inspection or examination. The rule will not be extended to a case where the maker could have inspected…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moultrie Repair Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Lunsford, Maxwell & Co. v. Malsby & AverySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Cook & Co. v. FinchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Means v. Subers SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. North Georgia Milling Co. v. Henderson Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Colt Co. v. HilandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Georgia Timberlands, Inc. v. Southern Airway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Securities Investment Co. v. JettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Segal v. Carroll Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Carter v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API