Legal Opinion

Everitt v. Haldeman-Julius Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1927No. 27,490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The action is one to recover under the workmen’s compensation law. The plaintiff recovered judgment, and the defendant appeals.

The plaintiff, an employee of the defendant, both operating under the workmen’s compensation law, sustained an accidental injury by which he lost a part of one of his fingers, thereby permanently partially disabling him. An arbitrator was appointed. He was ordered to make findings of fact on and arbitrate certain questions submitted to him. On evidence introduced, he made findings of fact as follows:

*116“1. That the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strong v. Sonken-Galamba Iron & Metal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Stefan v. Red Star Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Lane v. Sonken-Galamba Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Trowbridge v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Gilbert v. Independent Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neuhaus v. Hope Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Nolan v. Ernest Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API