Legal Opinion

Glidden Co. v. Hm Holdings, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1996No. Nos. 68765 and 69061PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patton, Judge.

This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action filed by plaintiff Glidden Company (“Glidden”) in which it sought a declaration of its rights to be indemnified for environmental claims by defendants HM Holdings, Inc. and Hanson PLC. The trial court dismissed the action, specifically declining to exercise jurisdiction over the matter. Glidden appeals from that ruling in case No. 69061. The trial court also denied defendants’ motion to disqualify Glidden’s counsel, the law firm of Thompson, Hine & Flory, finding no conflict of interest sufficient to justify disqualification.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Williams v. Green Bay & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Chambers v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Phillips v. PolcarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State ex rel. Judson v. SpahrOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hess v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Commercial Union Insurance v. Great American InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Dazey v. Pollock, Unpublished Decision (9-18-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Portage Roofing, Inc. v. Mike Coates Constr. Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API