Stolze v. Bank of Minnesota
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Ramsey county, in favor of defendant, entered in pursuance of the findings and order of Kelly, J.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an action by Fred H. Stolze, as assignee of tbe Elmer H. Dearth Agency, an insolvent corporation, to recover from tbe defendant $2,838.83, tbe balance of a general de-’ posit with tbe defendant to tbe credit of tbe insolvent at tbe date of its assignment to tbe plaintiff for tbe benefit of its creditors. Tbe answer admits tbe amount of tbe deposit, and alleges as an offset that tbe defendant loaned and advanced to tbe insolvent, at its request, before its assignment, various sums of money, amounting, in tbe aggregate, to $9,869.17, and took as security therefor certain negotiable…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- St. Paul & M. Trust Co. v. LeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Wilder v. PeabodySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Becker's Investment Agency v. ReaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3Cited by10 opinions
- Calcasieu-Marine National Bank of Lake Charles v. American Employers' Insurance Co., Louisiana Bank & Trust Co., Cross v. The Employers Liability Assurance Corp., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Wunderlich v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- United States Department of Health & Human Services v. Avila (In Re Avila)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1985
- Becker v. SeymourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Norris v. Commercial Nat. Bank of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.