Legal Opinion

State v. Garvin

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 17, 1996No. 15092PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

The issues on appeal are (1) whether the defendant’s conviction on two counts of failure to appear in violation of General Statutes § 53a-172 violated his federal constitutional right to be free of double jeopardy and (2) whether the trial court had an affirmative obligation to tell the defendant that he could withdraw his plea of guilty at his sentencing proceeding.1

The record reveals the undisputed facts and procedural history that follow. Two separate incidents caused the state to charge the defendant by way of two separate informations. One information charged the defendant with the crime…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. State v. FullerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. State v. WebbConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. In re Shane P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Merchant v. State Ethics CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API