Texas & Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. Patton
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GALLAGHER, Judge.
This is a motion filed by defendants in error asking a rehearing and a reversal of the judgment of the Supreme Court entered in this cause upon the report and recommendation of this section of the Commission of Appeals. 238 S. W. 202.
The motion is based on assignments of error presented to the Court of Civil Appeals by defendants in error as appellants, and overruled by that court. Defendants in error are entitled to have these assignments considered. Holland v. Nimitz (Tex. Sup. on rehearing) 239 S. W. 185.
The plaintiff in error never signed the lease in issue in this case,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hill v. HoeldtkeTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Spann v. Cochran & EwingTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Clegg v. BrannanTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- City of Tyler v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
- Brannin v. RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anderson v. EliotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- MacHann v. MacHannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Reeves Furniture Co. v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- San Jacinto Trust Co. v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Coffman v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.