Legal Opinion

Davis v. Harrison

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1946No. 29694PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiffs, as stockholders of Alaska Pacific Mines, Inc., and its successor, Alaska Pacific Consolidated Mining Co., instituted this action for the purpose of securing an accounting of certain transactions between defendant C. L. Harrison and the above-named corporation, Alaska Pacific Mines, Inc.; that all shares of stock in the corporations held by the individual defendants be adjudged to be the property of Alaska Pacific Consolidated Mining Co.; and for a judgment against the individual defendants for the value of stock irregularly secured by them, together with a money judgment for sums…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Dodge v. WoolseySupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Wallace v. Lincoln Savings BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  5. News-Journal Corporation v. GoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Baldwin v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Interlake Porsche + Audi, Inc. v. BucholzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. LaHue v. Keystone Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Bank of Mill Creek v. Elk Horn Coal Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API