United States v. Benjamin Harris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on December 5, 2012, and appearing at 2012 WL 6054778, is amended as follows:
On opinion pages 933-34, in the carryover paragraph, change “we must read § 46505,” through “By stating” to:
§ 46505—which lacks a similar reference—is unconstitutionally vague as applied. 4 We disagree. We have already explained why § 46505 gave fair notice to this Defendant that this knife was proscribed. Two other statutes—enacted at different times to address different subjects—do not change our conclusion. If anything, by stating
On opinion page 934, change “this interpretation,” to “that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McLaughlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. KilbrideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Gerald Eugene DishmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Valle Del Sol v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Christopher OsingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. James LuceroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Galbreath v. The City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Yasith ChhunCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.