Legal Opinion

County of San Luis Obispo v. Farnum

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1895No. 19491PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. V. A. Gregg, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

This is an action upon the hond of C. A. Farnum, as county auditor of the county of San. Luis Obispo, to recover the sum of eight hundred and; ninety-six dollars and ten cents, alleged to have been received by him, as auditor, from the license tax-collect- or of said county, the same being moneys collected for license taxes due the county from various individuals* and which Farnum had failed to pay over to the county treasurer; the other defendants and appellants, R. E.. Jack and I. Goldtree, being the sureties upon said bond*.

The complaint alleges that said moneys were received by…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bannock County v. BellIdaho Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. GorhamUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Fall v. Lincoln Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. State v. SnowWashington Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API