Bannock County v. Bell
Idaho Supreme Court
' APPEAL from District Court, Bannock County. The complaint shows upon its face that both causes of action are and were barred by the statute of limitations, and had so been barred for over a year prior to the filing of the complaint. (Idaho Rev. Stats., secs. 4053, 4060.) The statute of limitation runs as well against a municipal corporation as against an individual. (In re Opening of Beck Street, 19 Mise. Rep. 571, 44 N. Y. Supp. 1087; In re Opening of Fox Street, 19 Mise.
Read the full summary
' APPEAL from District Court, Bannock County. The complaint shows upon its face that both causes of action are and were barred by the statute of limitations, and had so been barred for over a year prior to the filing of the complaint. (Idaho Rev. Stats., secs. 4053, 4060.) The statute of limitation runs as well against a municipal corporation as against an individual. (In re Opening of Beck Street, 19 Mise. Rep. 571, 44 N. Y. Supp. 1087; In re Opening of Fox Street, 19 Mise. Rep. 571, 44 N. Y. Supp. 1087; Hartmcun v. Hunter, 56 Ohio St. 175, 46 N. E. 577; Gaines v. Hoi Springs Gounty, 39 Ark.…
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
— This action was brought by Bannock county against the appellant, who was clerk of the district court and ex-officio auditor and recorder of said county for the years 1893 and 1894. The complaint contains two causes of action, one for each of said years. It is alleged in the complaint in the first cause of action that the appellant, as clerk, auditor and recorder of said county, did, on the sixteenth day of January, 1894, present to the board of county commissioners of said county an account for services rendered by the appellant for said county for the year 1893 in his official capacity,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dunbar v. Board of Commissioners of Canyon CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
- Ada County v. GessIdaho Supreme Court · 1895
- Board of Commissioners v. Van SlyckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- People ex rel. Dunn v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Fremont County v. BrandonIdaho Supreme Court · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gladden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- City of Los Angeles v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Idaho Falls, an Idaho Mun. Corp. v. H-K Contractors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Mayor and Council of Wilmington v. DukesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.