Legal Opinion
Heinz v. Heinz
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 12, 1945No. Civ. 14876PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment (1) giving the physical custody of the minor son of the parties hereto to the Ambassador Gardens Nursery School for a period of one year, and (2) enjoining plaintiff from removing his minor son from the county of Los Angeles. This appeal is on the judgment roll alone.
The undisputed facts are these:
Plaintiff instituted the present action to obtain the exclusive custody of the minor son, age five, of the parties hereto. After a trial the court found that the plaintiff was a fit and proper person to have the care and custody of his minor son. 1 The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stever v. SteverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- In re WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Newby v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Peterson v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Luck v. LuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cal-Farm Insurance v. BoisserancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Shea v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Robertson v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Dozier v. DozierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Becker v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.