Legal Opinion

In re White

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1942No. Crim. No. 1781PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Petitioner asks, by her application for a writ of habeas corpus, to have the custody of Robert *638LaVoy White restored to her. A similar application, was made to the Superior Court, in and for the County of Tehama, and denied.

It is alleged in the petition that William D. White and Leathy Beryl White, paternal grandparents of the minor, are illegally detaining said minor and restraining him of his liberty.

The petitioner was the wife of LaVoy White, who obtained a divorce from her, the final decree being entered on May 15, 1940. The minor is the son of said parties, his age…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stever v. SteverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Newby v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. In Re HoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. In Re LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Eddlemon v. EddlemonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Roche v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Shea v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Robertson v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Odell v. LutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API