Legal Opinion

Dozier v. Dozier

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1959No. Civ. 23265PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

An interlocutory judgment of divorce was

granted after a default hearing, entered March 8, 1957. The parties stipulated that plaintiff have custody of the 8-year-old boy, Nathan, with certain visitation rights reserved to defendant; and that a mutual restraining order preventing Nathan’s removal from the state without prior court order or written consent of the other spouse be entered, all of which became a part of the interlocutory decree.

The undisputed facts disclose that plaintiff and defendant had lived with the child in New York and moved to California in September, 1954, where they…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Gantner v. GantnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Taber v. TaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Shea v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Luck v. LuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Stack v. StackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. In Re Marriage of EckertIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API