Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. McCarter Electrical Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 18, 1987No. 8710IC98PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

Plaintiff argues that the Industrial Commission erred in limiting his compensation to an award for damage to his back under N.C.G.S. § 97-31.

In order to obtain compensation under the Workers’ Compensation Act, the claimant must prove the existence of a disability as well as its extent. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co., 305 N.C. 593, 290 S.E. 2d 682 (1982). “Disability” is defined by N.C.G.S. § 97-2(9) as “incapacity because of injury to earn the wages which the employee was receiving at the time of injury in the same or any other employment.” “To support a conclusion of disability, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Hendrix v. Linn-Corriher Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Whitley v. Columbia Lumber Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Wilder v. Barbour Boat WorksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Fleming v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Duke University Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Clark v. Wal-MartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Arrington v. Texfi Industries, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995
  4. Cummings v. Lundy PackingNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002
  5. Davis v. Howell Steel ServicesNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API