Legal Opinion

Glaze v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

I. Introduction

These consolidated appeals and cross appeals consist of 38 petitions for review from orders of the Workers’ Compensation *195Appeal Board (Board) affirming, due to an evenly divided panel of eight commissioners, two sets of December 2008 orders of Workers’ Compensation Judge Pamela L. Briston (WCJ) in pension benefit offset eases. The City of Pittsburgh (City) and its current third-party administrator, UPMC Benefit Services (collectively, Eim ployer), seek review of the WCJ’s December 2, 2008, orders (Initial Order) that granted petitions to review…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Lach v. Fleth, Admr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Pennsylvania State University v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ayerplace Enterprises, LLC v. WCAB (Royal)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Glaze v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Marnie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Verizon Pennsylvania, LLC v. WCAB (Neugebauer)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. W. Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc. & BrickStreet Admin. Svcs. v. WCAB (Cochenour)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API