Legal Opinion

Marnie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

Harry Marnie (Claimant) petitions for review of the July 26, 2011 Order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the order of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying Claimant’s Petition for Review of Compensation Benefits Offset (Review Petition). The Board held that the actuarial methodology of the State Employees’ Retirement System (SERS) presented on behalf of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania/Department of Attorney General (Employer) was legally sufficient to establish Employer’s offset/credit (offset) in accordance with the Notice…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Pennsylvania State University v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Pittsburgh Board of Education v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API