Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hallawell

California Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1909No. Crim. No. 1485PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Sheriff of San Diego County. l The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Petitioner was convicted of a violation of ■section 8 of an act entitled “An act regulating the sale of poi.sons in the state of California and providing a penalty for the violation thereof.” (Stats. 1907, p. 124.) His contention is that the act is void. He had made previous application ■for his discharge to the court of appeals for the second appellate district, and was remanded to custody. The opinion and •conclusion of the court of appeals is reported in 8 Cal. App. 563, [97 Pac. 320], With what is there said we are in full accord. Petitioner urges other considerations not discussed by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re HallawellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Harbor v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Matter of Application of SchulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California v. SwoapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Matter of Yun QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. County of Los Angeles v. HurlbutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API