Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Mahoney

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 5, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, EJ.

Both parties in this attorney’s-fee dispute are experienced lawyers. The defendant, Brian F. Mahoney (“Mahoney'’), has appealed the allowance of the motion of the plaintiff, John P. Donovan (“Donovan”), for summary judgment on Donovan’s claim that Mahoney had breached a referral-fee agreement between the two.

Donovan, who was retiring from the practice of law, and Mahoney agreed in writing that Donovan would refer personal-injury clients to Mahoney. Mahoney would compensate Donovan in the amount of one-third of any contingency fee collected, plus any costs Donovan had incurred.

Dono…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seaco Insurance v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Basis Technology Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  3. Wilkinson v. Citation InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Clean Harbors, Inc. v. John Hancock Life InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  5. Commodore v. Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGrath v. ACT, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
  2. Donovan v. MahoneyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2012
  3. Big Wheel Truck Sales, Inc. v. RaposaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API