Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. Citation Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 17, 2006PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

In Preferred Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gamache, 426 Mass. 93 (1997) (Gamache), and its progeny, we articulated an exception to the “American Rule,” under which parties to litigation generally bear the expense of their own attorney’s fees regardless of the outcome of the case. The Gamache exception allows those who purchase insurance contracts containing a duty to defend provision to recover their attorney’s fees when they must resort to litigation against their insurer to enforce that duty. In the present case, we must consider whether to extend that exception to circumstances where the dispute…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Cody v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Hayseeds, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Allmerica Financial Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'sMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Passatempo v. McMenimenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. ACMAT Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. RFF Family Partnership, LP v. Ross Ex Rel. BD Lending TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. Holyoke Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vibram USA, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API