Legal Opinion

Sweeny v. Adams

California Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1904No. Sac. No. 1157PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County. G. W. Nicol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

LORIGAN, J.—

This is an election contest. The parties to this proceeding were rival candidates for the office of sheriff of Tuolumne County, at the last general election.

The board of supervisors, sitting as a canvassing board, declared the appellant elected to such office, and a certificate of election was duly issued to him.

Respondent, in due time, commenced a contest on the ground of malconduct on the part of the board of judges of election in counting the votes. Issue was joined, the cause tried, and the court found the charge of malconduct to be true, and that the respondent had received…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Minor v. KidderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Garrison v. RourkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Bush v. HeadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. McGregor v. Bd. of Trs. of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Cerini v. De LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. O'Dowd v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API