Legal Opinion
Downing v. McGrath
California Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1912No. S. F. Nos. 5457, 5450, 5455, 5456, 5458Published
APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from orders refusing a new trial. George H. Buck, Judge presiding. The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Dahler v. All Persons, ante, p. 160.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
These eases, one and all,, present the same proposition decided in Dahler v. All Persons (S. F. No. 5622), ante, p. 160, [124 Pac. 995].
The so-called abstract of title and certificate thereto of date February 24, 1908, were improperly admitted for the reasons given in the Dahler case. Wherefore, in each of the above entitled cases the judgment and order refusing a new trial are reversed and the cause remanded.
Rehearing denied.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dahler v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1912