Legal Opinion
Paul v. Harris v. Ralph H. Tahash, Warden, Minnesota State Prison
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 2, 1965No. 17884PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEHAFFY, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Paul V. Harris, appeals from an order of the United States District Court of Minnesota denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The issues presented to us are (1) whether the exclusionary rule of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), is applicable; and (2) whether the District Court erred in denying Harris’ petition without a plenary hearing on his allegations.
The facts are more elaborately related in the affirmance of appellant’s conviction by the Minnesota Supreme Court, State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260, 121 N.W. 2d 327…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Klingler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Fred Goins, C-9176 v. Joseph R. BrierleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United States v. ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Frederick Pennington, Jr. v. Vernon Housewright, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Harry R. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.