Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 7, 1966PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendants move herein, pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to suppress the use of two cartons allegedly seized from them in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights.
Based on the evidence adduced at the hearing, at which both defendants testified, as did the three railroad policemen involved as well as Agent Conlon of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, I find the following to be the facts (substantially as alleged by the Government) : *
In the early evening of Friday, November 5, 1965, at approximately 7:15 P.M., Lt. George Matwijeczko…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
- State v. DilleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- United States v. Maxie Thomas and Wilbur WigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- People v. MoralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- State v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.