Legal Opinion

Schlossberg v. B.F. Saul Insurance Agency of Md., Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 8, 2015No. Case No.: GJH-13-3076PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GEORGE J. HAZEL, United States District Judge

The question presented by this case is whether an insurance broker may be deemed negligent when an insured’s policy excludes coverage that the insured never requested but later needed. In this professional negligence action. Plaintiff, Roger Schlossberg, Chapter 7 Trustee of DTM Corporation (“DTM”), alleges that Defendants B.F. Saul insurance Agency of MD. Inc. (“B.F. Saul”) and David Schwarz (collectively, “Defendants”), failed to secure adequate insurance coverage for DTM’s activities and failed to explain a change in coverage…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  4. N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  5. James H. Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass Richard A. Rutta Ernest StickellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. Assisted Living Well Compassionate Care LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API