Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Murphy v. City Court of City of Tucson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 29, 1970No. 2 CA-CIV 885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Judge.

These special action proceedings were instituted to challenge an order of the respondent court suppressing certain evidence in a pending criminal prosecution. Since we have appellate jurisdiction in this matter, Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima County, 8 Ariz.App. 81, 443 P.2d 443 (1968), we have assumed jurisdiction to review the challenged order.

Briefly, the facts are as follows. The real party in interest was arrested by Tucson police officers and charged with driving while intoxicated in violation of A.R.S. § 28-692. He had been stopped by the police because…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. State v. FogleOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. BergArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. FaidleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Knoblich v. City CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Salt Lake City v. CarnerUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Salt Lake City v. CarnerUtah Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API